Tool for Assessing the Formation of Civic Competences in the Process of Physical Education: Development and Validation of the CCPE-10 Questionnaire

Authors

  • Iuliia Pavlova Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Bobersky
  • Nataliya Sorokolit Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Bobersky
  • Alla Solovey Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Bobersky
  • Roman Petryna Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Bobersky

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2021-03-21-30

Keywords:

civic and social competencies, physical culture, schoolchildren, factor analysis

Abstract

Introduction. A high level of civic literacy remains one of the main priorities of education, as it is the foundation for the development of democracy and economic growth. Physical education has significant potential for the formation and development of civic competencies. The Purpose of the study was to develop a valid tool for quantitative assessment of the level of civic competencies and the role of physical education in their formation. Research Methods. The study involved students who studied in third and sixth grades (n = 860, 53,72 % of respondents were girls, 34,88 % third graders). The Questionnaire on Civic Attitudes and Sustainable Development (СASD) was translated and culturally adapted; the special module, Civic Competences in Physical Education (CCPE-10), was created. The structure of the questionnaires and their validity were analyzed. For this purpose, we used exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, calculated the α-Cronbach, average variance extracted, and composite reliability coefficient. Results. In the structure of the CASD questionnaire, the scales solidarity, commitment–responsibility, and «dialogue–respect» were isolated. According to factor analysis results, the CCPE-10 questionnaire had scales communication skills and reflection, action, and identity. The obtained   models had satisfactory suitability criteria   (for СASD: χ²/ df = 2,53, CFI = 0,905, TLI = 0,902; RMSEA = 0,060, SRMR = 0,062; for CCPE-10: χ²/ df = 2,78, CFI = 0,901, TLI = 0,908; RMSEA = 0,058, SRMR = 0,064). Conclusions. An adapted and valid Ukrainian version of the tool for assessing civic competencies with a special module «Civic competencies in physical education» was obtained. The tool is designed for schoolchildren of third and sixth grades; contains six scales (solidarity, commitment–responsibility, dialogue–respect, communication skills and reflection, action, identity); covers such components of civic competencies as knowledge, skills, reflection, social cohesion, tolerance; the tool allows to quantify the importance of physical education in the formation of civic competencies.

References

Bibik, N. M. (Ed.). (2019). Nova ukrainska shkola: poradnyk dlia vchytelia [New Ukrainian school: a guide for teachers]. Kyiv: Litera LTD.

Nova ukrainska shkola: osnovy Standartu osvity [New Ukrainian school: basics of the Education Standard]. (2016). Lviv.

Pavlova, Yu. (2016). Ozdorovcho-rekreatsiini tekhnolohii ta yakist zhyttia liudyny [Health and recreational technologies and quality of human life]. Lviv: LDUFK.

Barber, C., & Torney-Purta, J. (2014). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA): Civic Education Study of 1999. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_393

Barrett, M. (2012). The PIDOP project: An overview. URL: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/775796/1/Barrett (2012).pdf

Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014). Political and Civic Engagement and Participation: Towards an Integrative Perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2013.871911

Barrett, M., & Zani, B. (2015). Political and Civic Engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. London: Routledge.

Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research: Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055 19909540118

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Ruiz-Ordóñez, Y., Salcedo-Mateu, A., Turbi-Pinazo, Á. M., Novella-García, C., & Moret-Tatay, C. (2020). CASD-14: A questionnaire on civic attitudes and sustainable development values for service-learning in early adolescents. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10), 4056. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104056

Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B., & Kerr, D. (2008). International civic and citizenship education study. URL: http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/ICCS_2009_Frame- work.pdf

Sherry, E. (2010). (Re)engaging marginalized groups through sport: The Homeless World Cup. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690209356988

Ten Dam, G., Geijsel, F., Reumerman, R., & Ledoux, G. (2011). Measuring young people’s citizenship compe- tences. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01485.x

Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2007). Educating for Adulthood or for Citizenship: Social competence as an educational goal. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435. 2007.00295.x

Torney-Purta, J., Cabrera, J. C., Roohr, K. C., Liu, O. L., & Rios, J. A. (2015). Assessing Civic Competency and Engagement in Higher Education: Research Background, Frameworks, and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12081

Tymruk-Skoropad, K., Pavlova, I., Sydoryk, N., Kulitka, Y., & Kruk, B. (2020). Assessment of disease-related knowledge among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study. Physical Activity Review, 8(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2020.08.24

Wild, D., Eremenco, S., Mear, I., Martin, M., Houchin, C., Gawlicki, M., … Molsen, E. (2009). Multinational trials – Recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: The ISPOR patient-reported outcomes translation and linguistic validation good research practices task force report. Value in Health, 12(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

Published

2021-09-30

Issue

Section

Historical, philosophical, juristic and organizational problems of physical culture

How to Cite

Tool for Assessing the Formation of Civic Competences in the Process of Physical Education: Development and Validation of the CCPE-10 Questionnaire. (2021). Physical Education, Sport and Health Culture in Modern Society, 3(55), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2021-03-21-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)