Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Functional Role Asymmetry in Counter-Strike 2

Authors

  • Volodymyr Paskiv Ivan Bobersky Lviv State University of Physical Culture
  • Mariana Mostova Ivan Bobersky Lviv State University of Physical Culture
  • Yaroslav Svyshch Ivan Bobersky Lviv State University of Physical Culture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2025-04-73-78

Keywords:

Counter-Strike 2, CS2, esports, functional role asymmetry, tactical decision-making

Abstract

Relevance. Functional differentiation of player activities is a core characteristic of high-performance team-based esports and a critical determinant of competitive success. In modern first-person shooter environments, increasing tactical complexity and accelerated decision-making requirements intensify the need for narrow specialization. Despite its relevance for coaching and performance optimization, positional stratification remains insufficiently systematized from a theoretical perspective, particularly within contemporary esports ecosystems. Purpose and Methods. The study substantiates the theoretical foundations of positional asymmetry in elite esports through an integrated interdisciplinary framework. The research employs a comprehensive narrative and analytical review methodology, systematically synthesizing findings from sports science, cognitive psychology, applied performance analysis, and esports pedagogy. Comparative analysis examines specific demands, cognitive profiles, and tactical responsibilities, with attention to decision-making structures. Results. The analysis identifies distinct operational profilesIn-Game Leader, Entry Fragger, Lurker, Support, primary sniper, and Anchoras differentiated systems of cognitive load, tactical responsibility, and communication patterns. Role-specific asymmetries significantly influence information processing speed, risk management strategies, spatial awareness, and team coordination mechanisms. The findings also highlight methodological parallels between esports and traditional sports, alongside evolutionary shifts in competitive requirements. Conclusions. Differentiation in esports should be conceptualized as a multidimensional construct integrating cognitive, psychological, and tactical components. The study substantiates the absolute necessity of developing adaptive analytical models and pedagogical strategies in esports training. It further proposes specific directions for future empirical validation using advanced performance telemetry and experimental designs.

References

Bennett, C. N., & Matyas, M. L. (2017). Data fabrication and falsification. In Best practices for publishing your research. Online Ethics Center, American Physiological Society. URL: https://onlineethics.org/cases/ best-practices-publishing-your-research-american-physiological-society/best-practices-3

Brammall, C., & Lowes, J. (2021). Coaching pedagogy. In G. Agnew (Ed.), Foundations of sports coaching: Applying theory to practice (3rd ed., pp. 129–151). Routledge.

Chugani, V. (2024, September 26). The analytics behind esports: Data-driven strategies in competitive gaming. Statology. URL: https://www.statology.org/the-analytics-behind-esports-data-driven-strategies-in-competitive- gaming/CS2.eu. (2025). CS2 entry fragger guide. URL: https://cs2.eu/guides/roles/entry-fragger

Domingues, H. C., Soares, A. L. C., Gonet, D. T., & Gomes, P. S. C. (2025). Characteristics of physical performance in professional female soccer athletes during a national competition. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 20(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.55860/qss5cd08

Dutra Zeni, M. L., Nunes, H. E. G., Sganzerla, G., & Bacciotti, S. de M. (2025). Tests in the evaluation of physical performance in racket sports: A scoping review. International Journal of Sports and Physical Education, 11(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-6380.1102005

Hall, D. (2024, July 25). Entry frag strategies: How to disrupt the enemy team’s economy with aggressive plays in CS2. BBNTimes. URL: https://www.bbntimes.com/technology/entry-frag-strategies-how-to-disrupt- the-enemy-team-s-economy-with-aggressive-plays-in-cs2

Jiao, F., Zhuang, J., Nitsche, M. A., Lin, Z., Ma, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Application of transcranial alternating current stimulation to improve eSports-related cognitive performance. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, Article 1308370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1308370

Jing, S., Awang, M. M., Wan Pa, W. A. M., Pan, P., Memmert, D., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Interpretable machine learning with SHAP for esports performance analysis of professional counter-strike players from 2012 to 2025. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.11 77/17479541251388864

Kholodov, I. (2025). Future of esports and the development of related professions (Bachelor’s thesis, Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences). Theseus. URL: https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/896518

Lee, S. (2025, March 19). 5 PCA approaches to enhance sports analytics performance. Number Analytics.

Lisk, T. C., Kaplancali, U. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2012). Leadership in multiplayer online gaming environments.

Simulation & Gaming, 43(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878110391975

Minnie, W. (2025, December 5). What is ADR in CS2? Average damage per round explained. esports.net. URL: https://www.esports.net/wiki/guides/cs2-adr-explained/

Morris, D. (2024, April 11). All Counter-Strike roles in detail | AWPer, IGL, and more! esports.net. URL: https://www.esports.net/news/counter-strike/all-cs-player-roles/

Pedraza-Ramirez, I., Musculus, L., Raab, M., Ramaker, B., & Laborde, S. (2025). Zooming in on decision making in esports: Exploring the perceptions of expert players and coaches. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 14(2), 335–351.

Phillips, N., & Green, C. S. (2024). Associations between cognitive performance and extreme expertise in different competitive eSports. Journal of Expertise, 6(4) & 7(1), 315–336. URL: https://www.journal- ofexpertise.org/articles/volume6_issue4_and_volume7_issue1/JoE_6_4_7_1_Phillips_Green.pdf

Riedl, E., & Verschuuren, P. (2025). A systematic literature review of esports integrity. The International Sports Law Journal, 25, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-025-00295-y

Taifalos, N. (2025, March 16). All roles in CS2: IGL, lurker, and more, explained. esports.gg. URL: https://esports.gg/news/counter-strike-2/all-roles-in-cs2/

Valls-Serrano, C., de Francisco, C., Caballero-López, E., & Caracuel, A. (2022). Cognitive flexibility and decision making predicts expertise in the MOBA esport, League of Legends. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221142728

Zanevskyy, I., Mostova, M., & Paskiv, V. (2025). University educational program for esports’ master science in Ukraine. International Journal of Sports and Physical Education, 11(2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.20431/ 2454-6380.1102002

Zhen Loo, M. M., et al. (2025). AntiCheatPT: A transformer-based approach to cheat detection in competitive computer games. arXiv. URL: https://arxiv.org/html/2508.06348v1

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Olympic and professional sport

How to Cite

Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Functional Role Asymmetry in Counter-Strike 2. (2025). Physical Education, Sport and Health Culture in Modern Society, 4(72), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2025-04-73-78

Most read articles by the same author(s)