Usage of the Method of Child Training for Improving Lessons of Physical Education for Children of 9–10 Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2020-04-23-29Keywords:
methodology, circuit training, primary school children, younger age, physical abilitiesAbstract
While exercising, there is a purposeful impact on the complex of body natural properties, which belongs to physical qualities of a person. Affecting physical qualities, under certain conditions, achieve a significant change of the level and direction of their development. In this regard, the aim of the research paper is to analyse the developed and scientifically grounded methods of circuit training for optimization of Physical Education lessons for primary school children. The Purpose of the Study – to elaborate and scientifically substantiate the training methods optimization of Physical Education lessons for primary school children. Research Organization, based on the fact, that 107 pupils of 9th–10th forms took part at the experiment. They were divided into experimental and control groups (experimental groups include 27 boys and 26 girls; control groups –28 boys and 26 girls). The experiment was attended by 9–10 year-old boys and girls that were included to the main medical group. Results.The chosen tests were informative in order to the dynamics detection of the developed methods and gave a positive growth for both groups (p <0,05; p <0,01). But the best result was shown by the experimental group. Due to the fact that during the methodology construction, not only the sensitive development, but also those aspects that would motivate the children before classes, were taken into consideration. Conclusions. Data, obtained during the methodology implementation of the circuit training, proved the effectiveness of our methods, that used during the school year as a modernized tool for increasing the level of physical preparedness of primary school children.
References
Fransen, J., Pion, J., Vandendriessche, J., Vandorpe, B., Vaeyens, R., Lenoir, R., & Philippaerts, R. M. (2012). Differences in physical fitness and gross motor coordination in boys aged 6–12 years specializing in one versus sampling more than one sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 379–386.
Gaetano, A. (2016). Relationship between physical inactivity and effects on individual health status. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16 Supplement issue 2, Art 170, 1069–1074. doi:10.7752/jpes.2016. 2170.
Ghyppo, A., Tkachov, S. & Orlenko, O. (2016). Role of physical education on the formation of a healthy lifestyle outside of school hours. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(2), 335–339.
Khan, N. A., & Hillman, C. H. (2014). The relation of childhood physical activity and aerobic fitness to brain function and cognition: a review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 26(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2013- 0125
Kirk, D. (2010) Physical education futures. London, England: Routledge. 45–51.
Kuffner, T. (2013) The Fitness Fun Busy Book: 365 Creative Game &Active to Keep Your Child Moving and Learning. Meadowbrook Press.
Lancaster, S., Teodorescu, R. (2008) Athletic Fitness for Kids. Human Kinetics. 184 p.
Lopes, L., Santos, R., Pereira, B., & Lopes, V. P. (2013). Associations between gross motor coordination and academic achievement in elementary school children. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.humov.2012.05.005
Rivilis, I., Hay, J., Cairney, J., Klentrou, P., Liu, J., & Faught, B. E. (2011). Physical activity and fitness in children with developmental coordination disorder: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 894–910.
Schmidt, M., Egger, F., Benzing, V., Jäger, K., Conzelmann, A., Roebers, C. M., & Pesce, C. (2017). Disentan- gling the relationship between children’s motor ability, executive function and academic achievement. PLoS one, 12(8), e0182845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182845
Shuba, L.V. (2014) Rukhlyvi ihry yak zasib rozvytku rukhovykh yakostei u shkoliariv pochatkovoi shkoly. Nauk. prakt. zhurnal. Pivdennoho naukovoho tsentru NAPN Ukrainy. Nauka i osvita. Pedahohika i psykholohiia: zb. nauk. pr. Odesa. Pivdennoukrainskyi natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni K.D. Ushynskoho. 8/CXXV, 212-216.
Shuba, L. V. (2016) Modern approach to implementation of health related technology for primary school children. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 2. 66–71. http://dx.doi. org/10.15561/18189172.2016.0210
Shuba, L.V. (2017). Optimization of physical culture lessons in primary school on the base of mobile games’ application. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 2. 87–93.
Thomas, R. (1995). Motor aptitudes. Tests and measurements for young athletes, CCPS Publishing House, Bucharest.
Van der Niet, A. G., Hartman, E., Smith, J., & Visscher, C. (2014). Modeling relationships between physical fitness, executive functioning, and academic achievement in primary school children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.02.010
Williams, H. G., Pfeiffer, K. A., O’Neill, J. R., Dowda M., McIver, K. L., Brown, W. H. (2008). Motor skill performance and physical activity in preschool children. Obesity (Silver Spring), 16, 121–126.
Winnick, J., Short, X. (2014) Brockport Physical Fitness Test Manual-2nd Edition with Web resource: A Health- Related Assessment for Youngsters with Disabilities. Human Kinetics; 2nd edition, 160.
1.jpg)
