Assessment of the Musculoskeletal Pain Level of Young Women with Metabolic Syndrome

Authors

  • Yuliya Kalmykova Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2024-02-71-81

Keywords:

metabolic syndrome, musculoskeletal system, pain intensity, visual analog pain scale, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-length ratio

Abstract

Topicality. Metabolic syndrome is an urgent issue and a serious health risk not only for adults but also for children, adolescents, and young people. An essential role in the metabolic syndrome emergence is played by the negative “achievements” of progress such as low physical activity, increased caloric intake, and chronic stress. All these factors cause a steady increase in arterial hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. There is significant evidence that obesity and chronic pain are closely related. Chronic pain is one of the main causes of weight gain of obese patients. The Research Aims to determine the intensity of musculoskeletal pain in young women with metabolic syndrome and the localization of their maximum pain, as well as to investigate the correlation between the intensity of pain depending on the location and indicators of body weight, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, and body length. Research Methods. To identify the subjective pain sensation according to the domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health b.280 – pain sensation, a visual analog pain scale was used in patients; to establish a correlation between pain intensity and pain localization in young women with metabolic syndrome, body weight, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio, as well as the ratio of waist circumference to body length were additionally calculated based on bioelectrical impedance. Research Results. According to the results of the responses, we can note that among the surveyed young women with metabolic syndrome, only 3,09 % indicated that they had practically no pain with localization in the neck, back, lumbar region, or joints. In general, we can state that in many cases it has been found that the manifestation of pain in women with metabolic syndrome in the back averages 4.8±1,5 cm (▁x±S), which corresponds to the level of “moderate” pain. A comparison of the subjects’ pain scores during the worst period, which was performed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test, showed that its intensity was statistically significant (H (3, N= 388) =87,69; p<0,05) depending on the localization. Conclusions. The obtained results prove that both overweight and abdominal obesity have negative effects on the manifestation of pain syndrome among women in the first period of adulthood but abdominal obesity has a stronger effect on its intensity. In particular, this type of obesity harms the lumbar spine of the subjects.

References

Kalmykova, Yu., & Kalmykov, S. (2023). Klinichnyi reabilitatsii menedzhment pry boli u nyzhnii chastyni spyny u khvorykh z metabolichnym syndromom [Clinical rehabilitation management of lower back pain in patients with metabolic syndrome]. Fizychna kultura, sport i zdorovia: stan, problemy ta perspektyvy: zb. tez XXIII Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (6 hrudnia 2023), 231–232 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu., Kalmykov, S., & Orshatska, N. (2020). Otsinka reaktsiyi sertsevosudynnoyi systemy na dozovane fizychne navantazhennya khvorykh na metabolichnyy syndrom pid vplyvom zastosuvannya fizychnoyi terapiyi [Assessment of the response of the cardiovascular system to dosed physical exercise in patients with metabolic syndrome under the influence of physical therapy]. Slobozhanskyi scientific and sports bulletin, 1(75), 17–24. https://doi:10.15391/snsv.2020-1.003 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Y. S. (2014). Metody doslidzhennya u fizychniy reabilitatsiyi: doslidzhennya fizychnoho rozvytku [Methods of research in physical rehabilitation: research on physical development]. Kharkiv: KhSAPC, 104 p. (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu. S. (2023). Obstezhennia ta diahnostyka khvorykh na metabolichnyi syndromom z bolem u nyzhnii chastyni spiny [Examination and diagnosis of metabolic syndrome patients with lower back pain]. Fizychne vykhovannia, sport ta zdorovia liudyny: dosvid, problemy, perspektyvy: materialy X Vseukr. nauk.- prakt. onlain-konf. (15 hrudnia 2023), Kyiv, 438–444 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu. S. (2023). Poshyrenistʹ ozhyrinnya ta metabolichnoho syndromu u osib molodoho viku: suchasnyy stan problem [Prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in young people: the current state of the problem]. Rehabilitation & Recreation, 14, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2023.14.5 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu. S. (2023). Suchasna problema metabolichnoho syndromu ta napriamy likuvannia pry metabolichnomu syndrome [The modern problem of the metabolic syndrome and directions of treatment for the metabolic syndrome]. Medychna reabilitatsiia v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan ta napriamy rozvytku, problemy ta perspektyvy: materialy III Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. z mizhnarod. uchastiu (8 veresnia 2023). Poltava, 9–19 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu. S. (2023). Suchasnyi pohliad na problemu vykorystannia sposobu zhyttia yak zasobu nemedykamentoznoi terapii metabolichnoho syndrome [Modern view of the issue of using lifestyle as a means of non-drug therapy of metabolic syndrome]. Rehabilitation and Recreation, 16, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.327 82/2522-1795.2023.16.5 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu. S., Dzhym, M. O., & Dzhym, V. Yu. (2024). Vzaiemozviazok khronichnoho boliu oporno- rukhovoho aparatu z metabolichnym syndromom u dyskursyvnomu poli naukovoho znannia [Relationship of chronic musculosketal pain with metabolic syndrome in the discourse field of scientific knowledge]. Rehabilitation and Recreation, 18(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2024.18.2.8 (in Ukrainian).

Kalmykova, Yu. S., & Kalmykov, S. A. (2023). Vazhlyvist vyznachennia otsinky yakosti zhyttia khvorykh na metabolichnyi syndromom z bolem u nyzhnii chastyni spiny [The importance of determining the quality of life assessment of metabolic syndrome patients with lower back pain]. Fizychna ta reabilitatsiina medytsyna v Ukraini v umovakh shyrokomasshtabnoi viiny: tezy dopovidei III Natsionalnoho Konhresu fizychnoi ta reabilitatsiinoi medytsyny (07–08 hrudnia 2023). Lviv, 15–16 (in Ukrainian).

Osadchuk, T. I., Kalashnikov, A. V., & Khits, O. V. (2021). Honartroz: poshyrenist ta dyferentsiinyi pidkhid do endoprotezuvannia [Gonarthrosis: prevalence and differential approach to endoprosthetics]. Ukrainskyi medychnyi chasopys, 6(146), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.32471/umj.1680-3051.146.222998 (in Ukrainian).

Tronko, M. D. (2018). Dosiahnennia ta perspektyvy rozvytku suchasnoi endokrynolohii v Ukraini (do 25-richchia NAMN Ukrainy) [Achievements and prospects for the development of modern endocrinology in Ukraine (to the 25th anniversary of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine)]. Endokrynologia, 23(1), 5–15 (in Ukrainian).

Atisook, R., Euasobhon, P., Saengsanon, A., & Jensen, M. P. (2021). Validity and Utility of Four Pain Intensity Measures for Use in International Research. Journal of Pain Research, 14, 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S303305 (in English).

Elabbassi, W. N., & Haddad, H. A. (2005). The epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Saudi medical journal, 26(3), 373–375 (in English).

Kalmykova, Y., Kalmykov, S., Bismak, H., Beziazychna, O., & Okun, D. (2021). Results of the use of physical therapy for metabolic syndrome according to anthropometric studies. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(2), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.162.09 (in English).

Kalmykova, Y., & Kalmykov, S. (2023). The effectiveness of the physical therapy program for patients with metabolic syndrome based on the study of the dynamics of the functional state of the autonomic nervous system and hemodynamic parameters. Fizicna Reabilitacia ta Rekreacijno-Ozdorovci Tehnologii, 8(2), 117– 127.https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2023-8(2).05 (in English).

Kalmykova, Y. S., Bismak, H. V., Perebeynos, V. B., & Kalmykov, S. A. (2021). Correction of carbohydrate metabolism by means of physical therapy of patients with metabolic syndrome. Health, sport, rehabilitation, 7(3), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2021.07.03.04 (in English).

Mäntyselkä, P., Miettola, J., Niskanen, L., & Kumpusalo, E. (2008). Chronic pain, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes: a community-based study. Pain, 137(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.007 (in English).

Parikh, R. M., & Mohan, V. (2012). Changing definitions of metabolic syndrome. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 16(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.91175 (in English).

Pashkevych, S., Kalmykova, Yu., Kashuba, V., Kalmykov, S., & Okun, D. (2024). Ways to improve the quality of life of patients with metabolic syndrome: a systematic review. Phytotherapy. Journal, 1, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-9680-2024-1-41 (in English).

Ryan, D. H., & Kahan, S. (2018). Guideline recommendations for obesity management. Medical Clinics of North America, 102(1), 49–63 (in English).

Seaman, D.R. (2013). Body mass index and musculoskeletal pain: is there a connection?. Chiropractic & manual therapies, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-21-15 (in English).

Svierchkova, O., Kalmykov, S., Rudenko, A., Pashkevych, S., & Romanchuk, O. (2024). Assessment of the function of the lower limb and gait of patients after knee replacement using physical therapy. Physical Rehabilitation and Recreational Health Technologies, 9(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2024-9(2).06 (in English).

Weldring, T., & Sheree M. S. Smith. (2013). Article commentary: patient-reported outcomes (pros) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health services insights, 6, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.4137/HSI. S11093 (in English).

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Section

Therapeutic physical training, sports medicine and physical rehabilitation

How to Cite

Assessment of the Musculoskeletal Pain Level of Young Women with Metabolic Syndrome. (2024). Physical Education, Sport and Health Culture in Modern Society, 2(66), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2024-02-71-81