Gender differences of the hierarchical structure value findings of different age pupils. National university of physical education and sport of Ukraine

Authors

  • Tetyana Krutsevych National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
  • Yevgenij Imas National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
  • Oksana Marchenko National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2018-03-26-35

Keywords:

pupils, gender-related differences, physical culture, sport, girls,guys, value findings

Abstract

Actuality: This article contains reviews of various aspects of gender-related problems and gender-related approach to physical education of pupils. Tasks of the article: The learning of the differences of hierarchical structure value findings of the different age youth. Methods: For examining the hierarchical structure value findings the method of M. Rockicha and questionnaires of S.Bem were used. Pupils of 5-10 forms took part in a researching.

Results of the study. It is proved that age-related aspect between male and female as common foreground value findings does exist at the same time there are significant differences in selection of terminal and instrumental values. Thus, it is evidenced about age-related changes of foreground qualities thanks to which pupils are able to achieve their goals. Phycological connection of sex in terminal and instrumental values hierarchy is also studied ( femininity,masculinity, androgyny). Differences in selection of own foreground values between boys and girls are detected. Conclusions: Interests, reasons, value findings in the sphere of physical culture, pupils’ attitude to motor-related activity should be studied, in order to shape strategy of attraction of youth to regular physical activity. Orientation to single mark of biological activity or psychosocial system can’t be the only thing in creation early mentioned system. That is why accounting of physiological and motor-functional peculiarities of pupils beside the complex of biosocial attribute is needed. Thus, it is so important that the physical education process of pupils should include gender approach.

References

Арканцева Т. А. Отношения родителей и детей в гендерном измерении. Учебное пособие. Москва : НОУ ВПО Московский психолого-социальный. институт, 2011 70 с.
Акусок А. М. Соціалізація особистості як психолого-педагогічна проблема. Соціальна педагогіка : теорія та практика. 2005. № 1. С. 23–25.
Бем С. Линзы гендера : Трансформация взглядов на проблему неравенства полов / Сандра Беем ; [пер. с англ.]. Москва : «Российская политическая энциклопедия» (РОССПЭН), 2004. 336 с.].
Кабиров Р. Ф. Формирование позитивного отношения студентов к физической культуре средствами ценностных ориентации: автореф. дис. . канд.пед. наук. Челябинск, 1996. 21 с.
Грошев И. В. Психофизиологические различия мужчин и женщин Москва : Издательство Московского психолого-социального института; Воронеж: Издательство НПО «МОДЕК», 2005. 464 с.
Дульмухаметова Гульнара Фаридовна. Педагогические условия половой дифференциации обучения младших школьников: автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. пед. наук. Казань, 2011. 38 с.
7. Ильин Е. П. Пол и гендер. Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2010. 686 с.
8. Круцевич Т. Ю. Контроль у фізичному вихованні дітей, підлітків і молоді: навчальний посібник, гриф МОНУ. Київ : Олімпійська література. 2011. 224 с.
9. Круцевич Т. Ю., Марченко О. Ю. Проблемы гендерного подхода в физическом воспитании Materialete Congresului Ştiinţific Internaţional «Sport. Olimpismsm. Sănătate Volumul». Chişină, Republica Moldova, 5–8 octobrie 2016. С. 233–240.
10. Марченко О. Ю. Особливості гендерної ідентичності у школярів різного віку. Педагогіка, психологія та медико-біологічні проблеми фізичного виховання і спорту: науковий журнал. 2014. № 1. с. 37–41.
11. Сухарев А. Г. Здоровье и физическое воспитание детей и подростков. Москва : Медицина, 1991. 270 с.
12. Фейербах Л. История философии. В 3-х томах. Т.З. М., 1967. 156 с.
13. Abraham W. T., Gramer R. E., Fernandes A. M., Mahler E. Infidelity, race and gender. Аn evolutionary on asymmetries in subjective distress to violations – of – trust [Infidelity, race and gender. Аn evolutionary on asymmetries in subjective distress to violations – of – trust]. Current Psychology. winter, 2001–2002 Vol. 20, №4. P. 337–348.
14. Gonsoulin M. Women’s Rights and Women’s Rites. Religion at the Historical Root of Gender Stratification [Women’s Rights and Women’s Rites. Religion at the Historical Root of Gender Stratification]. Electronic jornal of Sociology. 2005, P 329–334.
15. Pawlowski C. S., Ergler C., Tjørnhø j-Thomsen T., Schipperijn J. et al. 'Like a soccer camp for boys'. A qualitative exploration of gendered activity patterns in children’s self-organized play during school recess. European Physical Education Review. August 2015, Vol. 21. P. 275–291.
16. Slingerland M., Haerens L., Cardon G., Borghouts L. Slingerland M. Differences in perceived competence and physical activity levels during single-gender modified basketball game play in middle school physical education. European Physical Education Review. February 2014, Vol. 20. P. 20–35.

Published

2018-09-29

Issue

Section

Historical, philosophical, juristic and organizational problems of physical culture

How to Cite

Gender differences of the hierarchical structure value findings of different age pupils. National university of physical education and sport of Ukraine. (2018). Physical Education, Sport and Health Culture in Modern Society, 3 (43), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2018-03-26-35